In the News

In the News Archive
March 2017 (1)
February 2017 (4)
January 2017 (5)
December 2016 (2)
November 2016 (4)
October 2016 (4)
September 2016 (2)
April 2016 (2)
March 2016 (2)
February 2016 (5)
January 2016 (1)
December 2015 (1)
November 2015 (4)
October 2015 (4)
September 2015 (4)
August 2015 (6)
July 2015 (7)
June 2015 (5)
May 2015 (4)
April 2015 (3)
March 2015 (4)
February 2015 (1)
January 2015 (3)
December 2014 (6)
November 2014 (7)
October 2014 (2)
September 2014 (8)
August 2014 (12)
July 2014 (7)
June 2014 (5)
May 2014 (3)
April 2014 (8)
March 2014 (6)
February 2014 (6)
January 2014 (6)
December 2013 (5)
November 2013 (3)
October 2013 (8)
September 2013 (9)
August 2013 (4)
July 2013 (3)
June 2013 (1)
May 2013 (5)
April 2013 (10)
March 2013 (7)
February 2013 (3)
January 2013 (3)
December 2012 (4)
November 2012 (2)
October 2012 (3)
September 2012 (2)
August 2012 (6)
July 2012 (7)
June 2012 (3)
May 2012 (4)
April 2012 (9)
March 2012 (8)
February 2012 (4)
December 2011 (1)
November 2011 (2)
October 2011 (1)
September 2011 (5)
August 2011 (1)
June 2011 (5)
May 2011 (1)
April 2011 (1)
March 2011 (6)
February 2011 (3)
January 2011 (2)
December 2010 (3)
November 2010 (1)
September 2010 (2)
August 2010 (3)
July 2010 (3)
June 2010 (3)
May 2010 (7)
April 2010 (2)
March 2010 (3)
February 2010 (2)
January 2010 (1)
December 2009 (7)
November 2009 (2)
October 2009 (1)
September 2009 (5)
August 2009 (2)
July 2009 (3)
June 2009 (2)
May 2009 (3)
April 2009 (4)
March 2009 (4)
February 2009 (3)
January 2009 (6)
December 2008 (4)
November 2008 (3)
October 2008 (1)
September 2008 (1)
August 2008 (3)
July 2008 (1)
June 2008 (1)
May 2008 (1)
April 2008 (2)
March 2008 (1)
January 2008 (2)
October 2007 (1)
September 2007 (1)
July 2007 (1)
May 2007 (1)
March 2007 (1)
January 2007 (1)
November 2006 (1)
August 2006 (2)
June 2006 (3)
May 2006 (1)
December 2005 (2)
October 2005 (1)
September 2005 (1)

Evaluating Non-Lethal Weapons for military operations at Army War College

By Carol A. Kerr, U.S. Army War College Public Affairs Office | April 30, 2015

RELATED MEDIA
Article source and photos   (Related Story)
CARLISLE Barracks, Pa. -- You’d be hard-pressed to find an ‘old school’ lecture approach to elective education here. After oral comprehensive exams formally close out the core courses, students select the elective courses that hold promise for immediate value in follow-on career assignments. To characterize these courses, you’d note experiential learning approaches, and collaboration with experts while designing the course and during seminar discussion. Example, here, reflect the theme across electives – to learn through experience and through engagement with leading experts.

For the Non-Lethal Weapon Elective, DMSPO instructor Marine Col. Roger McFadden is collaborating with the Joint Non-Lethal Weapons Directorate and the Pennsylvania State University to explore the utility of non-lethal weapons. Through non-lethal technology presentations, immersive case studies – and a few hours on the firing range, today -- 27 students are considering best practices in use of non-lethal weapons across the range of military operations.

On the face of it, it’s a no-brainer: non-lethal trumps lethal -- or does it? The gist of the course is to explore the question. The students – among them, Military Police officers, Infantry, International Fellows -- developed case studies of NLW use as a means to better understand applicability in military operations. Soldiers are highly trained to immediately react to threats, using muscle memory. It’s a different training challenge when a Soldier, Sailor, Airman or Marine must take time to make a decision between options? NLW are useful at military checkpoints where its use can buy time and space to better understand the situation and decide about follow-on actions. However, with many of today’s NLWs having a maximum range of 50 meters, does reliance on NLW put Soldiers at risk from antagonists’ weapons? These experience-based considerations inform the discussion within The War College course.

The key is how to use non-lethal weapons, suggested one student about the options now ranging from tasers to the active denial systems. USAWC students are determining the utility and limitations of NLWs and evaluating the current and future role to support military operations.

Active Denial Technology includes two systems considered by The War College students. The non-lethal and long-range capability creates a “repel” effects against human targets with minimal risk of injury, using a directed, millimeter-wave energy of a specific radio frequency. The large-scale version of Active Denial Technology has been tested with more than 13,000 exposures on human volunteers both in static demonstrations and in realistic operational assessments,” according to the Joint NLW Directorate spokesperson Kelly Hughes

Non-lethal capabilities fielded among the Services today include --
  • Optical distractors or "dazzling lasers" provide non-verbal warnings to deter approaching individuals at a range of 25-1,000 meters.

  • Acoustic hailing devices produce focused, directional sound waves with pre-programmed foreign phrases to deter individuals at a range of up to 500 meters, depending on conditions.

  • Vehicle-entangling nets can be deployed in less than one minute to puncture and lock up the front tires of an approaching vehicle – and, in doing so, give time and space to assess intent. The Vehicle Lightweight Arresting Device can stop 5,500 vehicle moving at 30 mph.

  • Non-lethal flash bang warning shots are effective up to 300 meters.
Within the Department of Defense Non-Lethal Weapons Program, the Joint Non-Lethal Weapons Directorate and the Services fund science and technology, research and development, as well as test and evaluation of non-lethal weapons. It is important to note that the Services procure/equip and maintain their non-lethal weapons. The Services are also responsible for training for their service members on non-lethal capabilities.

Any new weapon the DOD develops is required to undergo a thorough legal, treaty and arms control compliance review prior to fielding. Non-lethal weapons are no exception. “All previously and currently fielded non-lethal weapons have undergone legal and arms control compliance reviews to ensure consistency with domestic law, and compliance with obligations assumed by the U.S. under applicable treaties, customary international law, and law of armed conflict,” according to Hughes. “In addition, sharing accurate information on the technologies used in non-lethal weapons is an important part of our efforts at the JNLWD.